Thursday, 4 February 2021

The economic effects of WTO membership for Azerbaijan


WTO was established with the objective of economic development by ensuring the free flow of trade among its members.[1] However, some argue that the WTO model does not guarantee gains for everyone, rather developed countries have more opportunities to take in the wealth of the planet through this “club”.[2]  Because Azerbaijan is in the accession process to WTO,[3] therefore we will analyze based on our national experience what benefits and drawbacks WTO accession implies for Azerbaijan as a developing economy and considering them is it worth becoming a WTO member after all?

            On one hand, the WTO membership requires large-scale reforms to be implemented in several fields of regulation, intellectual property and investments[4] which could facilitate trade inflow, economic growth, and foreign investment.[5] Take the example of arbitration legislation, according to the Doing Business report of the World Bank,[6] domestic arbitration is not permitted in Azerbaijan.[7] The decisions of the Supreme Court on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards also lack uniformity and stability mainly due to conflicting norms of the Civil Procedural Code and the Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on International Arbitration.[8] Being aware of this unpredictability, foreign investors are hesitant to invest in Azerbaijan which increases the dependence of the economy upon the sale of oil, while other sectors remain undeveloped. Apparently, the harmonization of national legislation to WTO provisions and establishing a more investor-friendly climate in the country will increase Foreign Direct Investments (“FDIs”) in the different sectors of the economy.[9] WTO regulations will also neutralize the country-wide  illegal monopolistic conducts of oligarchs and technocrats of the government.[10] Under applied regime, the ordinary citizens will also benefit the dropping prices, increasing quality of the market economy.

            On the other hand, WTO membership will have detrimental macroeconomic effects for the local business sectors of Azerbaijan.[11] The agricultural field is a perfect example of a potential downturn.[12] Given that Azerbaijan has a massive amount of agricultural production,[13] the sector employs 40% of the productive workforce of the country,[14] and contributes 6% of the state GDP,[15] agriculture is the most important non-oil field for the country.[16] In lieu of fragile oil prices, Azerbaijan also aims for economic diversification from oil to agriculture.[17] However, agricultural sector too has its own weaknesses that without government support, it is difficult to achieve an improvement in productivity, quality and competitiveness.[18] Hence, Azerbaijani government regularly supports the agricultural sector by subsidies to local producers and imposing higher tariffs on imported agricultural products. On contrary, WTO requires Azerbaijan to cut its tariffs on agricultural goods and permits state subsidies merely for carrying out research, improving infrastructure and establishing irrigation systems.[19] Currently, the Azerbaijani subsidy rate in agriculture ranges between 15-20 percent, nevertheless WTO’s demand is to modify the range to 5-10 percent.[20] Similarly, on imports of agriculture products grown in the country, Azerbaijan proposes higher bound tariffs between 30-50% to be imposed contrary to WTO standards.[21] Pursuing WTO requirements on trade liberalization and removing state intervention on the market will leave weak local firms alone in a fiercely competitive environment with global oligopolies within the WTO framework[22] before reaching adequate quality, production and competitiveness.[23] Subsequently, under this imperfect competition, foreign products would wipe out the domestic goods from the market.[24] Not only agriculture but also other progressive but volatile domestic sectors are not  capable of competing with their foreign rivals.[25] Moreover, the reduced tariff regime will cause the loss of confidence among local entrepreneurs in the non-oil sector, while the importation of certain goods and services will accrue to the detriment of local industries that are deprived of government safeguard.[26]

            To sum all up, Azerbaijan has two options either to participate in the globalization process through WTO membership where the 90% of world trade is going on or to stay away from this framework to protect its private sectors. Azerbaijan however must take into consideration the realities of today’s world. WTO membership will increase its trade partners and lead to diversification and market economy through liberalization and openness. Dependence on natural resources is not much promising since the oil and gas prices are fluctuating and they are not forever inexhaustible.  Thus, if Azerbaijan succeeds to join the organization as a developing country status with a longer transitional period for subsidies and tariff concessions on primarily important domestic sectors, it will lead to considerable economic growth in the long term.



[1] Huseynov, Rashad, Welfare and Economy-Wide Effects of Azerbaijan’s Accession to the World Trade Organization: A Quantitative Assessment. Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Institute for Food and Resource Economics. At 8. (15 January 2015).

[2] Guzman, A. T. (2004). Global Governance and the WTO. Harvard International Law Journal, 45(2), 303-351.

[3] Bayramov, V. (2010). The pros and cons of WTO membership for Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan in the World: http://biweekly.ada.edu.az/vol_3_no_4/The_pros_and_cons_of_WTO_membership_for_Azerbaijan.htm?print=1

[4] Ismayilova, A. (2007). The World Trade Organization and Azerbaijan: The past, present and the future. Impact Azerbaijan (1), 9-10.

[5] Bayramov, V. (2010). Azerbaijan’s Accession to World Trade Organization (WTO); Pros and Cons. The Center for Economic and Social Development, page. 3-36. Bayramov, V. (2010). The pros and cons of WTO membership for Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan in the World: http://biweekly.ada.edu.az/vol_3_no_4/The_pros_and_cons_of_WTO_membership_for_Azerbaijan.htm?print=1

[6] https://www.doingbusiness.org/

[7] Decision of the Baku Court of Appeals No.2-1(103)-376/2014 dated July 31, 2014

[8] Ruslan Mirzayev, Legislation and Practice of Commercial Arbitration in Azerbaijan, April 3, 2019, available at http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2019/04/03/legislation-and-practice-of-commercial-arbitration-in-azerbaijan/

[9] Aliyev, K. (20 February 2014). Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis. Gazimağusa, North Cyprus: Munich Personal RePEc Archive

[10] Bayramov, V. (2010). Azerbaijan’s Accession to World Trade Organization (WTO); Pros and Cons. The Center for Economic and Social Development, page. 3-36.

[11] Aliyev, K. (20 February 2014). Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis. Gazimağusa, North Cyprus: Munich Personal RePEc Archive

[12] Farhat, F. Y. (2007). Azerbaijan and the WTO: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Azerbaijan (1), 12-16.

[13] Mamed-Guliyev, M. (01 December 2007). Interview: Accession to the WTO. (A. Ismayilova, Interviewer) American Chamber of Commerce in Azerbaijan.

[14] Farhat, F. Y. (2007). Azerbaijan and the WTO: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Azerbaijan (1), 12-16.

[15] Huseynov, R. (15 January 2015). Welfare and Economy-Wide Effects of Azerbaijan’s Accession to the World Trade Organization: A Quantitative Assessment. Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Institute for Food and Resource Economics

[16] Aliyev, K. (20 February 2014). Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis. Gazimağusa, North Cyprus: Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

[17] Huseynov, R. (15 January 2015). Welfare and Economy-Wide Effects of Azerbaijan’s Accession to the World Trade Organization: A Quantitative Assessment. Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Institute for Food and Resource Economics

[18] Ismayilova, A. (2007). The World Trade Organization and Azerbaijan: The past, present and the future. Impact Azerbaijan (1), 9-10.

[19] Mamed-Guliyev, M. (01 December 2007). Interview: Accession to the WTO. (A. Ismayilova, Interviewer) American Chamber of Commerce in Azerbaijan.

[20] Mamed-Guliyev, M. (01 December 2007). Interview: Accession to the WTO. (A. Ismayilova, Interviewer) American Chamber of Commerce in Azerbaijan.

[21] Aliyev, K. (20 February 2014). Expected Macroeconomic Impacts of the Accession to WTO on Azerbaijan Economy: Empirical Analysis. Gazimağusa, North Cyprus: Munich Personal RePEc Archive

[22] Gallagher, K. P. (February 2008). Understanding developing country resistance to the Doha Round. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 62-85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25261955

[23] Gallagher, K. P. (February 2008). Understanding developing country resistance to the Doha Round. Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 62-85. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25261955

[24] Kourmanova, A. (02 July 2015). Kazakhstan and the WTO: A New Era. Center for Strategic and International Studies: https://www.csis.org/analysis/kazakhstan-and-wto-new-era

[25] Ismayilova, A. (2007). The World Trade Organization and Azerbaijan: The past, present and the future. Impact Azerbaijan (1), 9-10.

[26] Ismayilova, A. (2007). The World Trade Organization and Azerbaijan: The past, present and the future. Impact Azerbaijan (1), 9-10.

No comments:

Post a Comment

“Should pharmaceutical companies be allowed to enforce patent rights on their COVID-19 vaccines?” from Law and Economics Perspective

  Amongst the fight against the life-threatening COVID-19 pandemic, the question arises whether or not pharmaceutical companies must be gran...